South African government moves to inject 5-11 year olds with risky C-19 shot

Written by: Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

Lower income children the target of ineffective and unnecessary C-19 shots

However, courageous doctors like frontline veteran Dr EV Rapiti and Dr Faan Oosthuizen are speaking out to protect the country’s children. Many South African children live in abject poverty or in a child-headed household, and will inevitably suffer in South Africa’s broken public health system’s disturbing electricity crisis, if they experience physical or cognitive adverse effects after taking the low demand C-19 shot.

One of those children is 14 year old girl who faced her arm being amputated after being forced to take the C-19 shot to register at school. The Department of Health took no responsibility for the child, nor were schools warned to not force injections on children or teachers. SA VAERS has also discovered shocking information that children under the age of 5 are being unlawfully injected, with devastating consequences.

Department of Health Circular admits to not having a proper reporting system

On the 16th of February, the Department of Health released a Vaccination Circular 3 of 2023 Vaccination of Children 5 – 11 years signed by its acting Director-General Dr Nicholas Crisp, a circular not yet found on the DOH website. Crisp is currently the sole opposing deponent against a pioneering #StopTheShots case filed in South Africa, wherein CHD Africa executive director Shabnam Palesa Mohamed is involved.

Of particular concern is what these immune destroying shots would do to already at risk children, the complete lack of informed consent about the risks and how to report harm, and the horrifying admission that there will be no proper electronic recording system until April. It is becoming apparent in South Africa and around the world, that no ethical or functional government lead pharmacovigilance system exists.

Dr EV Rapiti. (MBBS. FCFP. MBA). Author and Anti-Apartheid Activist

Dr Rapiti, when hearing about Crisp’s circular, was driven to immediately write 29 substantial reasons why these unnecessary shots should not be given to vulnerable children, or any children, and he shared these with CHD Africa. Here are the contents of his incisive response:

Why Children don’t need the ‘Covid-19’ shots

The Department of Health’s reckless decision to make Covid-19 shots available to children aged 5 to 11, is absolutely shocking, given:

1) Covid is over

2) these jabs are ineffective against a highly mutated strain, Omicron

3) the current strain is mild, needing no intervention

4) 90% of children have natural immunity which is far superior to the shots

5) There is a high risk of myocarditis in children based on a study in Thailand

6) Children have a 100% recovery rate with no hospitalisation or complications

7) One has to jab 220,000 individuals to avoid one hospital admission

8) There are excellent treatments for covid-19 and its complications

9) These jabs are not fully tested especially for children

10) Proper informed consent is not being done at vaccination sites

11) Sites are not properly equipped for adverse events

12) The jab results in an autoimmune response in the organs, so they are not safe for children with an autoimmune disorder

13) Children with a compromised immune system will not be able to produce adequate immunity to the shot

14) Leading infectious disease specialists, like Dr Paul Offit, come out in the open saying they refuse to give their children boosters because of risk of myocarditis

15) Former WHO scientist and paediatrician, Dr Soumya Swaminathan said that there is no data that healthy children need to be vaccinated

16) the shots leads to VAIDS (‘vaccine’ acquired immune deficiency syndrome)

17) There is no compensation for jab victims if patients can’t prove cause.

18) The contents of shots have NOT been divulged by the manufacturers

19) Independent researchers have discovered that the vials contain graphene oxide and lipid nanoparticles, both of which are toxic

20) The shot spreads throughout the body and leads to an autoimmunity reaction wherever the spike lands

21) The antibodies for these shots is almost zero after 8 months, requiring boosters every three months

22) Repeated boosters can lead to immune fatigue and render people incapable of protecting themselves from common infections 

23) In females, the synthetic mRNA spike lands in the ovaries, and can cause menstrual irregularities and render them infertile.

24) Pfizer admitted that only 50% of their vials have intact mRNA vaccine, meaning that 50% of people are receiving a dud shot

25) The CEO of the CDC stated that the vaccinated and those with natural immunity are equally protected

26) Both jabbed and non-jabbed can spread the virus equally, according to the CDC

27) The spokesperson for Pfizer admitted to the EU parliament that they did not test the jab for transmission because they were traveling at the “speed of science”(sic).

28) Fauci admitted recently, after insisting on masking and boosters that the current mRNA shots do not give lasting protection

29) The Joint Committee for ‘Vaccine’ Intervention (UK) strongly recommended that children not be given the covid shot because of the low complications from corona virus and high level of natural immunity.

If these shots will still be made available, despite the risks of harm, there must be full disclosure about the lack of effectiveness, all possible adverse effects, and the right to refuse the shot, in accordance with the Bill of Rights, the NUREMBERG code, and the Children’s Act.

After all that we know about these C19 shots, the question remains: What is the rationale for Dr Nicholas Crisp to promote these risky and unnecessary injections for children? Common sense must prevail, and if it doesn’t, I sincerely hope that parents, guardians and all adults will ensure they make the right decision to protect our children. It takes a village to raise a child. Stop The Shots.

Dr E V Rapiti, Cape Town, South Africa
SA VAERS Advisor and Advocate

Why is the Department of Health going against the Ministerial Advisory Committee?

The Ministerial Advisory Committee, in August last year, wrote a memo to the Minister of Health Dr Joe Paahla, which weighs against injecting 5 – 11 year olds with C19 shots. The memo contains statements included in almost 1000 pages of #StopTheShots case evidence:

“Effectiveness of vaccination

1. 1. A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted up to 27 June 2022, identifying one clinical trial and 11 observational studies addressing this question. The studies included children 5 to 11 years of age and did not specifically report on those with higher risk of severe COVID-19 disease. 

1. 2. Generally, the absolute risk of hospitalisation or death with or without vaccination in this age group was very low

1. 3. There were two deaths reported overall, hence it is not possible to get a reliable estimate of protection against death.

1. 4. The review evidence suggests a small absolute benefit in the prevention of incident COVID-19 cases and hospitalisation if a two-dose BNT162b2 “vaccine” is offered to children aged 5 to 11 years old compared to placebo (low – moderate certainty evidence).”

“Current situation: access, costs and acceptability

1. 5. Availability of “vaccine”, feasibility: There is currently no registered paediatric 10ug dose COVID-19 “vaccine” in South Africa. The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) is reviewing a Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” that has a paediatric formulation.

   6. To provide “vaccine” for children 5 to 11 years of age, it is possible, as an interim measure to do fractional dosing of the adult “vaccine”, which has been implemented in other countries. This will need to be accompanied by training of the HCWs on the appropriate preparation of the dose

1. 7. The cost of the paediatric formulation is not yet known, and other resources required to vaccinate this population is likely to increase programmatic costs overall.

1. 8. Research data regarding acceptability of vaccination for 5 to 11 years of age is not known for South Africa, but it is noted that:

      a. in other countries where this “vaccine” is available acceptance is generally low due to concerns with side effects and about the overall benefit
      
      b. in 12 -18-year-olds in South Africa, uptake of the COVID-19 “vaccine” has been low with around 12% of this age group having received the 2 dose schedule.”

Call to Action – Winning in 5 steps

1. Share this article everywhere, and translate it if you are able to, thank you!
2. Share the flyer above and/or the 2 page PDF: Children – Rapiti – Crisp – C19shot
3. Tweet the South African government: @GovernmentZA and Department of Health @HealthZA
4. Follow CHD Africa on 5 social media platforms – and tag your family, friends, colleagues, allies:
   • Telegram: t.me/CHDafrica
   • Twitter: @CHD_Africa
   • Instagram: @af.childrenshealthdefense
   • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CHDafricachapter
   • Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/ChildrensHealthDefenseAfrica
5. Donate to CHD Africa once off or monthly and help us protect children